and this photo:
My thought is that unless there was intervention the two paralell lines would remain similar but apart forever, and only admire eachother. But, such intervention seems like it might put the universe out of whack or something. uh, maybe it would if their paths were just crossed once assuming they remained lines, but if the lines just become the same line only one is lost, but it is no huge loss, it is only absorbed into the other making it diverse yet similar in one, cool to think about. I love Geometry. Strangely, my husband hates it and trajectories and such, but I like geometry because it explains true principles in a way that can be understood, but the truths are too complex or hard to explain in life. And I get all offended feeling like it is some affront and by disliking geometry he is disliking truth or something. ha ha ha. Enough internet for me, today.
I'll explain what I lament like this: I respect such a straight and immovable line because I am so maleable, but consider myself a line, too. Well, Path's were crossed, but they are not even conguent. It was wisel said to me that two needed to be on the same page, so I knew that something had to change or we would just contine to increase in distance from one another. Maybe our mortal lives really can be explained by lines we are but segments and segments work in the arrangement of a marriage with three parts forming a triangle. As the two approach that "Point" they will be closer together:
This is an image representing the marraige covenant.
But, if they never cease this explination does not continue, the will meet as the point they are at becomes closer and closer through drawing closer to God, but they will grow farther apart after the point is reached and that is sad, so perhaps my husband is right in not liking geometry, or I am choosing it to misrepresent a principle.
No comments:
Post a Comment